![](http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/913/1709/400/95235/Action%2022.jpg)
Of course, there's a delicious irony to all of this. I once wrote a fan novelisation based on the Douglas Adams script for Doctor Who: The Pirate Planet, and that's recently been uploaded to the digital world. Like the Battle site, that was done on a not-for-profit basis, but it's still morally dubious ground in terms of copyright. I guess one difference is the fact my fanboy novelisation was an adaptation, whereas the Battle site simply reproduces my articles wholesale.
Now, where did I put that petard of mine?
3 comments:
Did you read their copyright page?
Putting up a notice acknowledging someone's copyright while at the same time breaching it isn't really much of a defence, imo.
The copyright holder hasn't been given the choice of whether they want their property appearing for free on someone'e internet site.
It's an interesting one.
I've, an odd time, posted a full article with an obvious link to where I copied it from. My main reason, from one particular source, is that they normally start charging to read their archives and I know I wouldn't be bothered paying just to see one article.
I do think what these 'cheeky monkeys' have done is definitley going too far and for that quantity and quality of material for their website they should've asked.
Post a Comment