
Having watched the first three episodes, Studio 60 has done enough to keep me watching - but the jury's still out on this one. The joy of Sorkin's previous TV show about a TV show, Sports Night, was it could show without an obligation to make the show it was showing seem like a funny, satirical sketch show about current affairs. Studio 60 has yet to find a way of making the show it shows resonate. But, like I said, I'm giving it time to show me the funny.

In Shark the lead character is an unlikable, obnoxious asshole who happens to be a brilliant lawyer. He treats his minions like dirt, has dysfunctional relationships with almost everybody and constant pain from a good daughter. It also has James Woods in the lead role, who makes most of that work while still being a character the viewers love. But Shark is going it second, which makes it less than fresh.
There's also several places where Shark is merely a minnow compared to House. In the medical drama, patients' lives are at stake. In Shark, it's a court case. Sure, they tend to be murder cases, but so what. Also, Shark is a lawyer who gets people on the stand and asks them questions without already the answer. He may suspect the answer, but we're expected to believe he is so intimidating or persuasive that the person being questioned gives it up anyway. Yeah. Right.
Lastly, House is essentially Sherlock Holmes with a medical degree, solving mysteries that baffle mere mortals. I don't get that same vibe off Shark. It feels like what it is - a carbon copy, neither as sharp or crisp as the original. I doubt I'll be bothering with Shark in future.

2 comments:
House is fun, but after 2 seasons here in Oz the limited formula is starting to wear a bit thin. And James Woods is no Hugh Laurie, so I can't see myself working up much enthusiasm for Shark. Terrible name too.
But I think The Wire has just started its 4th season in the States, which is alright by me. The first two were great, and the third awaits.....
Go McNulty!
Is studio 60 on UK TV?
Post a Comment